![]() ![]() In the July hearing, lawyers for the Texas Attorney General's office argued that women had not been harmed by the state's laws and suggested that their doctors were responsible for any harms they claimed.įor Cristina Nuñez, after she learned she was pregnant in May 2023, her health quickly worsened, according to an amended complaint filed by the Center for Reproductive Rights, the organization bringing the case. That move allows Texas' three overlapping abortion bans to stand. ![]() After a dramatic hearing in July, a district court judge agreed with the plaintiffs that the law needed to change, but the state immediately appealed her ruling directly to the Texas Supreme Court. The total number of patients suing Texas in this case is now 20 (two OB-GYN doctors are also part of the lawsuit). The case was originally filed in March with five patient plaintiffs, but more and more patients have joined the suit. The plaintiffs allege the exception for when a patient's life is in danger is too narrow and vague, and endangered them during complicated pregnancies. Nuñez and six other women joined an ongoing lawsuit over Texas's abortion laws. Now she is suing her home state of Texas, arguing that the abortion laws in the state delayed her care and endangered her life. She has diabetes, end-stage renal disease and other health conditions, and when she unexpectedly did become pregnant, it made her extremely sick. ![]() Cristina Nuñez's doctors had always advised her not to get pregnant. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |